Anti-Poaching Class Action Investigation

Abington Cole + Ellery is conducting an investigation regarding the business practices of multiple companies that include anti-poaching (or non-solicitation) provisions in their franchise agreements. Anti-poaching provisions may harm salespeople, mechanics, restaurant workers, hotel workers, tax return preparers, etc.

What is an anti-poaching provision? An anti-poaching provision is language in a franchise agreement prohibiting businesses from hiring one another's employees. Example: Hypothetical fast food chain "Max's Burgers & Fries" has a provision in all of its franchise agreements prohibiting all "Max's Burgers & Fries" restaurants from hiring away one another's employees.

Why do employers have anti-poaching agreements? To make it more difficult for its employees to leave for new jobs. Example: Hypothetical "Max's Burgers & Fries" on Main Street pays its employees $15/hour, while hypothetical "Max's Burgers & Fries" a mile away on Elm Street pays its employees $20/hour... The Main street employees can't get the identical, but higher-paying job on Elm street because of the anti-poaching agreement.

How do anti-poaching agreements harm employees? As can be seen in the example above, anti-poaching agreements make it more difficult for employees to get better, higher-paying jobs.

Importantly: Anti-poaching agreements affect ALL employees because they have been shown to drive down wages.

If you are an employee who works for an employer that uses anti-poaching agreements and would like to participate in a class action lawsuit regarding this matter, please submit your information via the form on this webpage.

Anti-Poaching Contact Form

Please note that an attorney client relationship is not created by submitting information through this web site.

For periodic updates on investigations, cases and the law, like us on or follow us on
Copyright © 2019 | 918.588.3400 | 800.969.6570 | | Disclaimer | Sitemap